Search for question
Question

4. This problem deals with a very practical

question that concerns the inhabitants of this

planet. The question is "in a democracy, when

can we expect the majority of citizens to favor

a government that provides private goods in a

public way?". This problem also addresses

issues of efficiency arising from the public

provision of private goods.

On planet Jumpo, there are two goods,

aerobics lessons and bread. The citizens all

have a Cobb-Douglas utility function of the

form Ui(Ai, Pi) = A₁ P₁" where Ai and Pi

are citizen i's consumption of aerobics and

bread.

Although tastes are all the same, there are two

different income groups, the rich and the poor.

Every rich person on Jumpo has an income of

100 fondas and every poor person has an

income of 50 fondas (fonda is the currency of

planet Jumpo). There are two million poor

people and one million rich. Bread is sold in the

usual way and costs 1 fonda. Aerobics lessons

are provided by the state, in identical

quantities for each person, and the price to the

state for aerobics lessons is 2 fondas per/nlesson. The cost of state-provided lessons is

paid for by taxes collected from citizens. The

state has no other expenses, so the sum of the

taxes must equal the total cost of the aerobics

lessons. Jumpo is a democracy, and the

number of aerobics lessons to be provided is

decided by a vote of the citizens.

a. Assume that the cost of state-provided

aerobics lessons is paid for by requiring each

person to pay an equal amount of taxes (per

capita taxation). If each citizen receives 20

lessons, what will be the government's total

expenditure on lessons? How many taxes will

each citizen have to pay? If 20 lessons are

given, how much will a rich person have left to

eat bread after paying the tax? What about a

poor person?

b. Since aerobics lessons are provided

publicly, everyone receives the same amount,

and no one can have more lessons for that

matter, each person faces the same

optimization problem. Write down this

optimization program and explain it.

c. How many lessons will the rich want the

state to provide? How many lessons will the

poor want the state to provide? (Still assuming

per capita taxation and identical quantities for

each individual).

d. If the result is determined by a majority vote,

how many aerobics lessons will be provided?/nhow many aerobics lessons will be provided?

How many loaves of bread will the rich get?

How many loaves of bread will the poor get?

e. Assume that aerobics lessons are

"privatized" in such a way that no lessons are

provided publicly and no taxes are collected.

Each person can buy as many lessons as they

like and as many loaves of bread as they like.

Assume that the price of the bread remains 1

fonda per unit and the price of the lesson

remains 2 fondas per unit. How many aerobics

lessons will the rich receive? And the poor?

How many loaves of bread will the rich buy?

And the poor?

f. Suppose that aerobics lessons remain

publicly available, but are paid for by a tax

proportional to income. Suppose that if A

aerobics lessons are offered to every person in

Jumpo, the tax for the rich will be 3A fondas

and the tax for the poor will be 1.5A fondas.

With these tax rates, how many aerobics

lessons will the rich get? And the poor? How

many aerobics lessons per head will the

majority vote for? How many loaves of bread

will the rich get? (Hint: remember to rewrite

each group's budget constraint)./ng. Calculate the utility of a rich person and a

poor person

i. If we apply a per capita tax

ii. In case of privatization

iii. If a tax proportional to income is applied

h. Compare these three systems according to

the Pareto criterion. Is privatization

Pareto superior to the per capita tax? Is the tax

proportional to income superior to the per

capita tax in the Pareto sense? Is privatization

superior in a Pareto sense to a tax proportional

to income? Explain your answers.

Fig: 1

Fig: 2

Fig: 3

Fig: 4


Most Viewed Questions Of Microeconomics

[1] What are the "choice variables and what are the "parameters' in this problem? What is the difference between them? [2] How do we know this problem has a solution? [3] Explain the relevant Lagrangian function. [4] Explain the conditions that will characterize a KT-point. [5] Use the conditions in part [4] to find the optimal consumption bundle (r*, y), and the associated Lagrange multiplier X*. [6] Explain why z* and y* can be interpreted as "functions". [7] Find the partial derivative of z* with respect to each "parameter of the problem". [8] Explain the interpretation of each partial derivate you find in part [7]. [9] Find the "indirect utility function' V = u(x, y), and explain its interpretation. [10] Find the partial derivative of V with respect to M, and explain its interpretation.


12) In the market for smartphones, the price elasticity of supply is +0.8, and the price elasticity of demand is -1.2. At equilibrium, price is $800 and quantity is 400000. (a) Assuming supply and demand are linear, reconstruct and draw the supply and demand curves. Label the intercepts. (b)To help consumers and phone-makers, the government proposes to subsidize smartphones by $80each. What are PB and PS after the subsidy? What is the new equilibrium quantity? Illustrate them on the same graph. (c) Calculate the change in consumer surplus, producer surplus, government expenditure, and dead weight loss and identify them on the graph.


7) Suppose that a consumer's marginal rate of substitution at her current chosen bundle is MUX /MUY = 4, but she is able to exchange X and Y at Px/PY = 3. Should she keep her current bundle,or can she make herself better off by trading at these prices? Which good will she buy, and which will she sell?


Question One Jane and John are a new couple trying to make a future production plan together. Assume there exist two types of production they can conduct: Household Production (HP) and Market Production (MP). If Jane does household production, her production value is $20 per hour; if she does market production, her production value is $10 per hour. If John does household production, his production value is $10 per hour; if he does market production, his production value is $20 per hour. Both Jane and John can work 8 hours on workdays. a) Calculate Jane and John's possible production frontiers (PPFs) on a workday and draw them in two diagrams. b) Combine Jane and John's PPFs in the same diagram. If both of them conduct market production, only, what would be their combined PPF? Show it in the diagram. If they do wish to keep some household production, who should do it? Show this new PPF in the diagram. Is there a limitation on this new PPF? c) On the other hand, if both Jane and John conduct household production, only, what would be their combined PPF? Show it in a diagram. If they do wish to keep some market production, who should do it? Show this new PPF in the diagram. Is there a limitation on this new PPF? d) If Jane and John "pool" their production possibilities together and split these possibilities equally between household production and market production, what would be their new PPFs? Show them in a diagram. e) Is there a gain for Jane and John to collaborate? If so, show it in a diagram.


5. (6 points) Suppose when we look at the monthly sales of hamburgers & fries in the Devil's Den, we see that when CCSU increased the price from $7 to $13, the quantity demanded fell from 8,000 meals to 4,000 meals.


QUESTION 4 A firm uses two inputs x and y, and their profit function is P(x,y)=3xy-2x+y. Input x costs $2 each and y costs $1 each and they are constrained to spend a total of $100 on inputs.


2. For each of the explanatory variables, P, CP, M and PE, calculate the respective demand elasticities for Hind Oil Industries’ product in the month September 2015. Remember to show all calculations. What additional information about Maa mustard oil do these values provide?


1. Analyze the estimated demand function by using the estimated coefficients to discuss the impact of each of the explanatory variables, P, CP, M, and PE, on the quantity of Maa mustard oil demanded. In discussing the impact, consider a one unit change in each variable while holding the others constant.


3) Illustrate the following utility functions by sketching indifference curves in the X,Y space: (Need not be to scale as long as the general shape is reasonable) (a) U(X,Y) = 2X + 3Y (perfect substitutes)(b) U(X,Y) = X1/2Y 1/2 (Cobb-Douglas) (c) Derive the expression for the Marginal Rate of Substitution for the utility functions above.


Two MSU fraternities, Phi Kappa Sigma and Phi Kappa Tau, are accustomed to each having 6 parties a month. Phi Kappa Sigma and Phi Kappa Tau are located close to each other on Bogue Street. These parties impose a negative externality on their other neighbors on Bogue Street. Suppose President Stanley decides that the socially optimal total number of parties on Bogue Street is 8 parties a month. The total benefits each fraternity derives from having a certain number of parties a month are given in the table below.